Wednesday, 30 March 2016

FORMATIVE & SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT, PURPOSE OF ASSESSMENT , METHODS OF ASSESSMENT , PRINCIPLES OF ASSESSMENT

Formative Assessment
The goal of formative assessment is to monitor student learning to provide ongoing feedback that can be used by instructors to improve their teaching and by students to improve their learning. Formative assessment provides feedback and information during the instructional process, while learning is taking place, and while learning is occurring. Formative assessment measures student progress but it can also assess your own progress as an instructor. A primary focus of formative assessment is to identify areas that may need improvement. These assessments typically are not graded and act as a gauge to students’ learning progress and to determine teaching effectiveness.
Types of Formative Assessment
§  Observations during in-class activities; of students non-verbal feedback during lecture
§  Homework exercises as review for exams and class discussions)
§  Reflections journals that are reviewed periodically during the semester
§  Question and answer sessions, both formal—planned and informal—spontaneous
§  Conferences between the instructor and student at various points in the semester
§  In-class activities where students informally present their results
§  Student feedback collected by periodically answering specific question about the instruction and their self-evaluation of performance and progress
Summative Assessment

The goal of summative assessment is to evaluate student learning at the end of an instructional unit by comparing it against some standard or benchmark. Summative assessment takes place after the learning has been completed and provides information and feedback that sums up the teaching and learning process. Typically, no more formal learning is taking place at this stage, other than incidental learning which might take place through the completion of projects and assignments. Grades are usually an outcome of summative assessment. Summative assessment is more product-oriented and assesses the final product, whereas formative assessment focuses on the process toward completing the product.
Types of Summative Assessment
§  Examinations (major, high-stakes exams)
§  Final examination (a truly summative assessment)
§  Term papers (drafts submitted throughout the semester would be a formative assessment)
§  Projects (project phases submitted at various completion points could be formatively assessed)
§  Portfolios (could also be assessed during it’s development as a formative assessment)
§  Performances
§  Student evaluation of the course (teaching effectiveness)
§  Instructor self-evaluation
PURPOSES OF ASSESSMENT
     The following are the different purposes of assessing learners.
§  For promoting to next class.
§  To grade or rank a student.
§  To predict success in future study and work.
§  To provide feedback to students.
§  To motivating students.
§  To diagnose students strength and weaknesses.
§  To help students to develop students self-awareness.
§  To improve teaching.
Methods of assessment
1.   Group assessment : This develops interpersonal skills and may also develop oral skills and research skills (if combined, for example, with a project).
2. Self-assessment : Self-assessment obliges students more actively and formally to evaluate themselves and may develop self-awareness and better understanding of learning outcomes.
3. Peer assessment : By overseeing and evaluating other students’ work, the process of peer assessment develops heightened awareness of what is expected of students in their learning.
4. Unseen examination : This is the ‘traditional’ approach. It tests the individual knowledge base but questions are often relatively predictable and, in assessment, it is difficult to distinguish between surface learning and deep learning.
5. Testing skills : It can be useful to test students on questions relating to material with instead of which they have no familiarity. This often involves creating hypothetical knowledge scenarios. It can test true student ability and avoids problems of rote- and surface-learning.
6. Coursework essays : A relatively traditional approach that allows students to explore a topic in greater depth but can be open to plagiarism. Also, it can be fairly time consuming and may detract from other areas of the module.
7.  Oral examination : With an oral exam, it is possible to ascertain students’ knowledge and skills. It obliges a much deeper and extensive learning experience, and develops oral and presentational skills.
8. Projects : These may develop a wide range of expertise, including research, IT and organisational skills. Marking can be difficult, so one should consider oral presentation.
9. Presentations : These test and develop important oral communication and IT skills, but can prove to be dull and unpopular with students who do not want to listen to their peers, but want instead to be taught by the tutor.
10.     Multiple choice :These are useful for self-assessment and easy to mark. Difficulties lie in designing questions and testing depth of analytical understanding.
11. Portfolio: This contains great potential for developing and demonstrating transferable skills as an ongoing process throughout the degree programme.
12.     Computer-aided : Computers are usually used with multiple-choice questions. Creating questions is time consuming, but marking is very fast and accurate. The challenge is to test the depth of learning.
13.     Literature reviews : These are popular at later levels of degree programmes, allowing students to explore a particular topic in considerable depth. They can also develop a wide range of useful study and research skills.
PRINCIPLES OF ASSESSMENT
Good principles will help those wishing to evaluate their assessment designs or their implementations in practice. Following are the important principles that might kept in mind while assessing performance of learners .
1.   It should be clear and has direct link with outcomes :
The assessment strategies employed by the teacher in the classroom need to be directly linked to and reflect the syllabus outcomes. The methods of assessment should be planned in a very clear manner.
2. It should integrate to teaching and learning :
Effective assessment practices involves selecting strategies that are directly  derived from well structured teaching and learning activities. These strategies should provide information concerning student progress and achievement that helps to inform ongoing teaching and learning as well as the diagnosis of areas of strength and need.
3. It should be comprehensive and balanced :
Effective assessment program should give  result of  performance in all areas may be in scholastic as well as co-scholastic. Teacher should take care a balanced adoption of assessment strategies.
4. Strategies adopted should be valid and reliable :
Valid and reliable assessment strategies are those that give results that what the teacher actually assess not only in a particular situation but also in other situations.
5. It should be fair :
Effective assessment strategies are designed to ensure equal opportunity for success regardless of students’ age, gender, physical or other disability, culture, background language, socio economic status, etc.
6. It should be student centered :
The learning outcomes and the assessment process to be used should be made explicit to students. Students should participate in the negotiation of learning task and actively monitor and reflect up on their achievement and progress.
7. It should be time efficient and manageable :
Teachers need to plan carefully the timing frequencies and nature of their assessment strategies. Good planning ensures that assessment and reporting is manageable and maximizes the usefulness of the strategies selected.
8. It should enable to recognize individual achievement and progress :
All students must be given appropriate opportunities to demonstrate achievement. For giving constructive feedback to the students the assessment strategies should enable to evaluate learners individually.
9. It must ensure active involvement of Parents :

School authorities should ensure full and informed participation by parents in the continuing development and review of the school policy on assessment process.

No comments:

Post a Comment